<?xml version="1.0"?>


<rss version="2.0" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
<channel>
	<title>forgetfoo.com - it's just a pixel baby.</title>
	<link>http://www.forgetfoo.com/</link>
	<description>Last 10 blog entries at forgetfoo.com</description>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<copyright>Copyright 2012</copyright>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 06:46:50 EST</lastBuildDate>
	<managingEditor>foo&#064;forgetfoo.com</managingEditor>
	<webMaster>foo&#064;forgetfoo.com</webMaster>
	<ttl>180</ttl>
	
	
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Giants vs. Patriots]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.forgetfoo.com/?blogid=13755]]></link>
	    <description><![CDATA[well it's finally here, guys... Super Bowl weekend is upon us, and the final game of the season is only two days away &amp;ndash; which begs the question &amp;ndash; who do you think will win the Super Bowl re-match between the Giants and Patriots?<p><img src="http://www.forgetfoo.com/images/blog/giants_300x.jpg" border="0" alt="New York Giants" class="pic" /><img src="http://www.forgetfoo.com/images/blog/patriots_300x.jpg" border="0" alt="New England Patriots" class="pic" /></p><p>i'm still secretly pull'n for the Giants, even though i tend to like the Patriots a bit more.</p><p>why you ask? well, if for no other reason than i'd love to see Eli win another one and have something to rub in his big brothers face for the rest of eternity... he's like the dorky little brother that's probably put up with so much shit over the years, i can just imagine how awesome it'd be for him to be able to <em>finally</em> rub it in peyton's face &amp;ndash; not to mention, it might help in shutting up all the commentators that jerk off to peyton manning all the damn time.</p><p>on the flipside, i think that brady is one of the best quarterbacks we've seen.</p><p>either way, should be a good one!</p>]]></description> <pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 17:46:00 EST</pubDate> <category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
  </item>
  
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[The Un-Obama]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.forgetfoo.com/?blogid=13754]]></link>
	    <description><![CDATA[we had a 24 hour hackathon going on yesterday, so i was up all night working on our project -- which went really well, i do believe -- and have been sleeping it off most of the day... but it's still friday, and i'd hate for it to go on by without at least trying to keep up with tradition and post the lastest from victor hanson... so here we go -- <a href="http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/289935/un-obama-victor-davis-hanson" title="The Un-Obama - The president can win reelection if he runs on what he didn't do." target="_blank" class="bold">The Un-Obama</a><blockquote><img src="http://www.forgetfoo.com/images/blog/obama_golf-250x.jpg" border="0" alt="" align="right" class="pic" />Barack Obama's favorability in the polls fell when he acted like himself â?? overexposed, hard-left in his press conferences, and boastful about legislative achievements like Obamacare and a stimulus of more than $1 trillion.<p>Then a strange thing happened. Obama largely went quiet. Often he was out of sight, vacationing in Hawaii or golfing. It was almost as if he had learned that the less he was seen or heard, the more Americans liked the idea of Obama as president rather than the reality of his constant "Make no mistake about it" and "Let me be perfectly clear" sermonizing.</p><p>Obama has now edged ahead of his potential Republican rivals in the polls. He waited for the noisy Republicans to grab national attention in the debates and primaries before moving hard to the left to firm up his base. So while the nation was amused, repelled, and bored by the constant back-and-forth over Mitt Romneyâ??s moneymaking and Newt Gingrich's marriages and off-the-cuff philosophizing, President Obama matter-of-factly canceled the vital Keystone-pipeline project.</p>He even more quietly prepared to ask Congress to raise the debt ceiling to over $16 trillion to accommodate his fourth consecutive reckless trillion-dollar-plus annual deficit -- while planning to slash the defense budget in the next decade. Did anyone notice that he made controversial "recess" appointments when Congress was not really in recess -- a tactic that, as a senator, he had opposed?</blockquote><p>another good one as always... yeah, i know you love it. heh.</p>]]></description> <pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 17:36:00 EST</pubDate> <category><![CDATA[Op/Ed]]></category>
  </item>
  
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Babe vs. Babe]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.forgetfoo.com/?blogid=13753]]></link>
	    <description><![CDATA[it's coming up on 5 o'clock and i still have a long way to go, but i figured it was a good time to take a break and post another quickie around here... so here we go, mang &amp;ndash; which do you think is sexier?<p><img src="http://www.forgetfoo.com/images/blog/bvb_267-1.jpg" border="0" alt="" class="pic" /><img src="http://www.forgetfoo.com/images/blog/bvb_267-2.jpg" border="0" alt="" class="pic" /></p><p><b>**</b> same rules as always, so no douchebaggery allowed.</p>]]></description> <pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 16:49:00 EST</pubDate> <category><![CDATA[Babe vs. Babe]]></category>
  </item>
  
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Pic of the Day]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.forgetfoo.com/?blogid=13752]]></link>
	    <description><![CDATA[seems like i've been seeing alot of candice swanepoel of late, which isn't a bad thing. *g*<p><img src="http://www.forgetfoo.com/images/blog/candice_swanepoel_legs_bootd.jpg" border="0" alt="" class="pic" /></p>]]></description> <pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 15:16:00 EST</pubDate> <category><![CDATA[Schweeeet]]></category>
  </item>
  
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Hackathon!]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.forgetfoo.com/?blogid=13751]]></link>
	    <description><![CDATA[well, it's that time once again.... every now and then, we have a <em>hackthon</em> here at work, and today's the day for our latest one &amp;ndash; meaning, we've all thought about different projects and things we'd like to do, got together with our buddies, and will be hack'n away at it for the next 24 hours.<p><img src="http://www.forgetfoo.com/images/blog/hackathon-dark-640.jpg" border="0" alt="Hackathon!" class="pic" /></p><p>it's going to be a <em>loooooooong</em> day, that's for sure!</p><p>...and yes, i'm going to be one tired mofo come morning.</p><p class="gry">good_stuff.png</p>]]></description> <pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 11:55:00 EST</pubDate> <category><![CDATA[Work]]></category>
  </item>
  
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Design Test: Signin]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.forgetfoo.com/?blogid=13750]]></link>
	    <description><![CDATA[this past week we ran an A+B design test on <a href="http://www.addthis.com/" target="_blank">addthis.com</a>, where we basically had 80% of the traffic going to our <a href="http://www.addthis.com/login" target="_blank">sigin in</a> page get the current version (control) and the remaining 20% of visitors getting the new sexy version (test cell).<p><b>New Sexy Design</b><br/>there's a lot of changes here, but mainly we wanted to combine both the Signin and Registration pages into one, where you can click back-n-forth on the tabs to do either one &amp;ndash; with an emphasis on using social sign in's like facebook, twitter, and google.</p><p><img src="http://www.forgetfoo.com/images/blog/addthis-signin-test-01.jpg" border="0" alt="" class="pic" /></p><p><img src="http://www.forgetfoo.com/images/blog/addthis-signin-test-02.jpg" border="0" alt="" class="pic" /></p><p><b>The Current Design</b><br/>in the current version, both the Sign In and Registration pages are seperate, with their own URLs and not as much emphasis on social login buttons.</p><p><img src="http://www.forgetfoo.com/images/blog/addthis-signin-test-03.jpg" border="0" alt="" class="pic" /></p><p>i was really pulling for the new sexy design, and was kind of dismayed to find out after a few days of A+B testing that it was actually <em>performing worse</em> than the current (control) version that we have up now.... yeah, shocked me too, but i guess that's why we test things to find out what works and what doesn't... i still don't want to give up on it, though, and believe with a few tweaks it can work just as good as the current version for users.</p><p>anywho, thought i'd blog about it since i found it pretty damn intresting.</p>]]></description> <pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 11:11:00 EST</pubDate> <category><![CDATA[Web Design]]></category>
  </item>
  
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[6 More Weeks?!]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.forgetfoo.com/?blogid=13749]]></link>
	    <description><![CDATA[<a href="http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/abc-blogs/punxsutawney-phil-isnt-always-122732863&amp;ndash;abc-news.html" title="Punxsutawney Phil Isn't Always Right" target="_blank" class="bold">Punxsutawney Phil Isn't Always Right? Get outta here.</a><blockquote><img src="http://www.forgetfoo.com/images/blog/groundhog-phil-250x.jpg" border="0" alt="" align="right" class="pic" />Nearly five thousand revelers hoping for an early spring were disappointed  today after Punxsutawney Phil saw his shadow.<br /><br />But those winter jackets may be able to go in the closet sooner than the forecasting groundhog has to say.<br /><br />It turns out the ultimate prognosticator- and his copycat counterparts- are wrong more often than they are right.<br /><br />An analysis by the National Climatic Data Center found there is no correlation between Phil's predictions and the actual weather.<br /><br />But don't tell that to the members of the Groundhog club's Inner Circle in Punxsutawney, Pa.<br /><br />"I would argue with the comments he doesn't have a great track record," Jon Johnston, Phil's "Chief Healthman" told ABCNews.com. "They're missing the point then. It's always winter somewhere."<br /><br />And more often than not, Phil agrees.</blockquote><p>first off, i'm once again reminded of just how effin fat that groundhog is... secondly, it was like 73 degrees here yesterday afternoon &amp;ndash; yeah, <b>73 degrees</b> in february. *blink*</p>]]></description> <pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 10:08:00 EST</pubDate> <category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
  </item>
  
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Facebook Goes IPO, Today]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.forgetfoo.com/?blogid=13748]]></link>
	    <description><![CDATA[<a href="http://gizmodo.com/5881223/reminder-the-5-billion-facebook-ipo-wont-make-you-rich" title="Reminder: The $5 Billion Facebook IPO Won't Make You Rich" target="_blank" class="bold">Reminder: The $5 Billion Facebook IPO Won't Make You Rich</a><blockquote><img src="http://www.forgetfoo.com/images/blog/facebook-logo-250x.jpg" border="0" alt="" align="right" class="pic" />It's widely reported that Facebook is going to file for an IPO today, and likely that the offering will be in the $5 billion range. Time to start digging up your backyard bullion stash, right? Wrong. For the average guy the Facebook IPO is strictly Like, don't touch.<p><b>So I Can Buy Facebook Shares Today?</b></p>Nope! Sorry. What's reportedly happening today (and almost certainly happening this week) is that Facebook is filing a propectus for its IPO with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The prospectus will be a fun read for the finance folk; it's an in-depth look at finances, projections, and how Facebook sees the competitive landscape.<br /><br />It's also when Facebook finally says how much it thinks it's worth. Or rather, how much the investment bankers it hired (supposedly Morgan Stanley and a few others, in this case). And when I say "worth," I don't mean how much money it has in the bank or how much revenue it takes in. The gigantic number (that $100 billion) that you'll hear associated with Facebook today is a flimsy one, a guess. It's how much the company is expected to be worth as it continues to grow over time.<br /><br />After the prospectus has been submitted, there's a "quiet period" while the SEC considers its validity. Bottom line: Assuming Facebook files all its papers today&amp;#8212;and they're all in order&amp;#8212;it's going to be a few months before Facebook shares are actually listed.</blockquote><p>dude, it's going to be pretty effin crazy to see just how much Facebook ends up being valued at if they do end up going IPO this week &amp;ndash; with 800 million users, i can't even quite wrap my head around it... hell, to be honest, i don't know how much further they can go before tap'n out... i <em>never</em> thought that many people would sign up and use it the site.</p><p class="gry">blows_my_mind.png</p>]]></description> <pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 13:56:00 EST</pubDate> <category><![CDATA[Online/Web]]></category>
  </item>
  
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Kate Does Carl Jr.]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.forgetfoo.com/?blogid=13747]]></link>
	    <description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2012/02/01/exclusive-kate-upton-hottest-girl-yet-to-do-carls-jr-commercial/" title="Kate Upton 'hottest girl' yet to do Carl's Jr. commercial" target="_blank" class="bold">Kate Upton 'hottest girl' yet to do Carl's Jr. commercial</a><p><img src="http://www.forgetfoo.com/images/blog/kate-upton-carl-jr-640x.jpg" border="0" alt="" class="pic" /></p><p>i haven't seen this new Carl Jr's ad with kate in it yet... have you?</p>]]></description> <pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 12:50:00 EST</pubDate> <category><![CDATA[Online/Web]]></category>
  </item>
  
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Kate Upton, Beach Bunny]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.forgetfoo.com/?blogid=13746]]></link>
	    <description><![CDATA[oh yeah... what can i say? i'm a sucker for seeing more of kate upton on the beach in a bikini... just never gets old for me.<div class="vid"><object width="640" height="360"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/wcPohpBQ7ug?version=3&amp;amp;amp;hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/wcPohpBQ7ug?version=3&amp;amp;amp;hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="640" height="360" wmode="transparent" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></div><p><strong>p.s.</strong> <a href="http://www.nationalturk.com/en/upton-vergara-top-most-desirable-list-with-votes-from-undesired-men-16220" target="_blank">Kate Upton, Sofia Vergara top 'most desirable' list</a></p>]]></description> <pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 12:48:00 EST</pubDate> <category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
  </item>
  
</channel>
</rss>
