<?xml version="1.0"?>


<rss version="2.0" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
<channel>
	<title>forgetfoo.com - it's just a pixel baby.</title>
	<link>http://www.forgetfoo.com/</link>
	<description>Last 20 blog entries at forgetfoo.com</description>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<copyright>Copyright 2009</copyright>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 16:46:30 EST</lastBuildDate>
	<managingEditor>foo&#064;forgetfoo.com</managingEditor>
	<webMaster>foo&#064;forgetfoo.com</webMaster>
	<ttl>180</ttl>
	
	
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Victoria's Secret 2009]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.forgetfoo.com/?blogid=10908]]></link>
	    <description><![CDATA[here's some photos of the new Victoria's Secret show... sure, they pretty much wear the same thing every year, but who really cares? they're super hot babes strutting their stuff in lingerie, and that just never gets old. *grin*<p align="center"><img src="http://www.forgetfoo.com/images/blog/vs_show2009-01s.jpg" width="270" height="349" border="0" alt="Victoria's Secret Show, 2009 (1)" class="pic" /><img src="http://www.forgetfoo.com/images/blog/vs_show2009-02s.jpg" width="270" height="349" border="0" alt="Victoria's Secret Show, 2009 (2)" class="pic" /></p><p align="center"><img src="http://www.forgetfoo.com/images/blog/vs_show2009-03s.jpg" width="270" height="349" border="0" alt="Victoria's Secret Show, 2009 (3)" class="pic" /><img src="http://www.forgetfoo.com/images/blog/vs_show2009-04s.jpg" width="270" height="349" border="0" alt="Victoria's Secret Show, 2009 (4)" class="pic" /></p><p>i still don't know when it's airing on tv... you'd think they'd have it splashed all over their <a href="http://www.victoriassecret.com/">website</a>. damn.</p><p><strong>update:</strong> looks like it's showing Dec. 1st on CBS</p>]]></description> <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 14:15:00 EST</pubDate> <category><![CDATA[Schweeeet]]></category>
  </item>
  
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Carmen Electra Sex Tape]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.forgetfoo.com/?blogid=10907]]></link>
	    <description><![CDATA[this one's been making the rounds for the last few days, at least in various feeds i subscribe to... and i've gotta say, i'm not sure why the hell this is being called a "sex tape" &amp;mdash; she's not nude, and there isn't any sex going on... but whatever, felt like posting it anyways.<div align="center" style="padding:25px 0;"><object width="640" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/hWczM7sHHdE&amp;amp;hl=en_US&amp;amp;fs=1&amp;amp;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/hWczM7sHHdE&amp;amp;hl=en_US&amp;amp;fs=1&amp;amp;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" wmode="transparent" width="640" height="385"></embed></object></div><p>i'm not even sure how old Carmen Electra is nowadays, but she's been around for a long time it feels like... she's gotta be in her late 30's i'd imagine, and still looking pretty damn good &amp;mdash; i certainly wouldn't kick her out of bed.</p>]]></description> <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 14:07:00 EST</pubDate> <category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
  </item>
  
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Boring Blog Designs?]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.forgetfoo.com/?blogid=10906]]></link>
	    <description><![CDATA[i was just checking out and reading this latest from smashing magazine -- <a href="http://www.smashingmagazine.com/the-death-of-the-blog-post/#more-18623">the death of teh blog post</a> -- and while it's certainly different &amp;amp; i applaud the work that went into it, there's just no way that you're typically blogger has the time or dedication to do something like this for every new post.<p><img src="http://www.forgetfoo.com/images/blog/sm_boring_blogs640.jpg" width="640" height="196" border="0" alt="The death of the boring blog post?" class="pic" /></p><p>the "designer" in me thinks is pretty damn cool, and i love some of the sites out there that have been doing it... i mean, anybody that's been visiting <a href="http://jasonsantamaria.com/">jason santa maria</a> has seen how he's been rolling out custom mini-designs with some of his posts for awhile now, and it's pretty slick -- but for most of us with jobs, families, friends, girlfriends and wives... there's just not enough time in the day to do it.</p><p>if i blogged like once a week, i'd be all over it though... heh.</p><p><strong>p.s.</strong> content is king.</p>]]></description> <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 13:08:00 EST</pubDate> <category><![CDATA[Web Design]]></category>
  </item>
  
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Apple's Black Friday]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.forgetfoo.com/?blogid=10905]]></link>
	    <description><![CDATA[well, it looks like even the might Apple is getting into the fun with some "Black Friday" sales -- but naturally, it's all in the details, as the operative phrase here is "up to"... which can mean anything and probably will just disappoint people going to an Apple store looking for a good deal.<p align="center"><img src="http://www.forgetfoo.com/images/blog/apple-black-friday.jpg" width="559" height="697" border="0" alt="" /></p><p>personally, if they really were having a kickass black friday sale and i could walk in and get a new 27" iMac for 25% off... yeah, i'd be sorely tempted that's for damn sure.</p><p>not gonna happen, though. damnit.</p><p><strong>p.s.</strong> <a href="http://www.paulgraham.com/apple.html">Apple's Mistake</a></p>]]></description> <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 11:19:00 EST</pubDate> <category><![CDATA[Online/Web]]></category>
  </item>
  
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Drink More Beer!]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.forgetfoo.com/?blogid=10904]]></link>
	    <description><![CDATA[<a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/8367141.stm" title="Alcohol 'protects men's hearts'" class="bold">Drinking alcohol every day cuts the risk of heart disease in men by more than a third...</a><blockquote><img src="http://www.forgetfoo.com/images/blog/talking-beer-glass.jpg" width="240" height="240" border="0" alt="" align="right" class="pic" />The Spanish research involving more than 15,500 men and 26,000 women found large quantities of alcohol could be even more beneficial for men.<br /><br />Female drinkers did not benefit to the same extent, the study in Heart found.<br /><br />Experts are critical, warning heavy drinking can increase the risk of other diseases, with alcohol responsible for 1.8 million deaths globally per year.<br /><br />The study was conducted in Spain, a country with relatively high rates of alcohol consumption and low rates of coronary heart disease.<br /><br />The research involved men and women aged between 29 and 69, who were asked to document their lifetime drinking habits and followed for 10 years.<br /><br />Crucially the research team claim to have eliminated the "sick abstainers" risk by differentiating between those who had never drunk and those whom ill-health had forced to quit. This has been used in the past to explain fewer heart-related deaths among drinkers on the basis that those who are unhealthy to start with are less likely to drink.</blockquote><p>something most of us guys have known deep in our hearts for a very long time now, i'm sure... but here's just further proof that drinking is not just socially fun, but also good for you. heh.</p><p>so the next time your girlfriend or wife gets on your case about having a beer, you can simply point out the research... i mean, we need to protect our hearts afterall, right?</p><p><strong>p.s.</strong> <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/8367760.stm">A meteor briefly illuminated parts of the sky in Utah to daylight-level...</a> which probably scared the hell out of some people out, i'm sure.</p>]]></description> <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 11:14:00 EST</pubDate> <category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
  </item>
  
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Circling Sharks]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.forgetfoo.com/?blogid=10903]]></link>
	    <description><![CDATA[<a href="http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=MTE5NzE4MDAxZjU2YjRjZmYwY2NhNWMxODM5NjExNTM=" title="Circling Sharks Smell American Blood" class="bold">Circling Sharks Smell American Blood</a><br/>America should keep quieter abroad &amp;#8212; and try finding a bigger stick.<blockquote>On his recent trip to Asia, President Obama found China, Japan, and South Korea &amp;#8212; like many nations these days &amp;#8212; in no mood to hear more American lectures.<br /><br />Beijing is worried about owning so much American debt. Tokyo is tiring of an American military base in Okinawa, and wants to redefine its relationship with us. Seoul is starting to doubt American commitment to keep it safe from North Korea.<br /><br />Why all the sudden pushback to our charismatic president?<br /><br />Our dollar is crashing, while the price of gold is soaring. The budget deficit has never been worse &amp;#8212; and the president wants to float even more debt for health-care and energy initiatives.<br /><br />By the end of this presidential term, we may add another $9 trillion to our already astronomical $11 trillion debt. Unemployment has already topped 10 percent. This quarter&amp;rsquo;s trade deficit reached a near-historic high. Our debtors and oil exporters talk of scrapping the dollar as the common international currency.<br /><br />American hesitation abroad reflects the shaky economic news. In Afghanistan, we can&amp;rsquo;t decide whether to seek victory or admit defeat &amp;#8212; or simply vote present by keeping the status quo. President Obama reached out to enemies such as Mahmoud Ahmadinejad of Iran and Hugo Ch&amp;aacute;vez of Venezuela. But so far they remain unimpressed, despite his apologizing for an assortment of supposed past American sins.<br /><br />The Chinese don&amp;rsquo;t listen all that much anymore to our sermons on their human-rights, coal-burning, and free-trade abuses &amp;#8212; not when they hold $1.5 trillion in U.S. assets. The president took a lot of flak for bowing to Saudi royals and the Japanese emperor. But why wouldn&amp;rsquo;t he show deference &amp;#8212; given America&amp;rsquo;s huge dependence on foreign oil and Japanese imports?</blockquote><p>in keeping with my regular victor hanson posting every friday, so no surprises here... good article though, and one that's been resignating with most americans for awhile now -- i really don't know many people that are exactly happy about the turn of events this past year, and how it seems to just be getting worse and worse since Obama took office.</p>]]></description> <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 11:03:00 EST</pubDate> <category><![CDATA[Op/Ed]]></category>
  </item>
  
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Victoria Teases]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.forgetfoo.com/?blogid=10902]]></link>
	    <description><![CDATA[why there's four deliciously hot Victoria's Secret models showing off pink bra's, but fully clothed wearing t-shirts and jeans is beyond me... man, nobody likes a <em>tease</em>.<p><img src="http://www.forgetfoo.com/images/blog/spl140415_004.jpg" width="640" height="441" border="0" alt="Victoria Teases" class="pic" /></p><p><strong>p.s.</strong> don't they have their annual show coming up soon?</p>]]></description> <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 14:41:00 EST</pubDate> <category><![CDATA[Schweeeet]]></category>
  </item>
  
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Chrome OS Revealed!]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.forgetfoo.com/?blogid=10901]]></link>
	    <description><![CDATA[well it looks like everybody's talking and tweet'n about the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/19/googles-chrome-os-revealed/">first peek at google's Chrome OS</a>, but i have to say... feeling pretty damn underwhelmed looking at it -- sure seems like it's just the Chrome browser maximized, but i guess that's the point. *yawn*<p align="center"><img src="http://www.forgetfoo.com/images/blog/chrome-os-debut-0088-rm-eng.jpg" width="600" height="398" border="0" alt="Google Chrome OS revealed!" class="pic" /></p><p>here's some tech speek from the google guys about it:</p><blockquote>"In Chrome OS every application is a web application. There are no native applications. That gives us simplicity. It's just a browser with a few modifications. And all data is Chrome OS is in the cloud."</blockquote><p>so will google be paying for everybody to have internet access at all times?</p><p><strong>p.s.</strong> <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-30685_3-10401867-264.html?tag=inside">Mozilla not interested in building a Firefox OS</a></p>]]></description> <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 13:54:00 EST</pubDate> <category><![CDATA[Online/Web]]></category>
  </item>
  
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Star Trek on Blu-Ray]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.forgetfoo.com/?blogid=10900]]></link>
	    <description><![CDATA[i watched the new <cite>Star Trek</cite> movie on blu-ray lastnight, and... wow... holy hell it looked and sounded great! i'm not even a big Trekkie fan or anything, and i thought the movie was great -- even had me smiling and laughing at a few scenes.<p><img src="http://www.forgetfoo.com/images/blog/trekkie3.jpg" width="640" height="272" border="0" alt="New Star Trek (1)" class="pic" /></p><p><img src="http://www.forgetfoo.com/images/blog/trekkie6.jpg" width="640" height="272" border="0" alt="New Star Trek (2)" class="pic" /></p><p><img src="http://www.forgetfoo.com/images/blog/treknew7.jpg" width="640" height="272" border="0" alt="New Star Trek (3)" class="pic" /></p><br /><p><img src="http://www.forgetfoo.com/images/blog/treknew2.jpg" width="640" height="291" border="0" alt="New Star Trek (4)" class="pic" /></p><p><img src="http://www.forgetfoo.com/images/blog/treknew9.jpg" width="640" height="271" border="0" alt="New Star Trek (5)" class="pic" /></p><p>here's to hoping they come out with another one that's just as badass.</p>]]></description> <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 11:27:00 EST</pubDate> <category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
  </item>
  
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[New Engadget Design]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.forgetfoo.com/?blogid=10899]]></link>
	    <description><![CDATA[one of the first things i heard about and went to go check out as soon as i fired up my browser was <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/19/welcome-to-the-next-engadget/">the new redesign of Engadget</a> -- which is probably one of the most popular blogs on the internet, least that i know of, and has been a site i usually check out at least once a day... it's packing some new features, which is nice, and at a glance sure seems kind of "busy" to my eyeballs... but i guess that's the trend these days.<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/"><img src="http://www.forgetfoo.com/images/blog/engadget_redesign2009.jpg" width="640" height="455" border="0" alt="Engadget's New Design" class="pic" /></a></p><p>interesting choice of fonts... other than my eyes kind of going all over the place at a glance, first thing i really noticed was the default font their using -- which is "Times"... wow, color me surprised.</p><p>also noticed that they rolled out their own customized version of <a href="http://www.addthis.com/">AddThis</a> for their sharing, which is pretty damn cool. heh.</p><p><strong>sidenote:</strong> g'damn i hate that big effin Ad placed at the top of the page... c'mon, really?</p><p><strong>p.s.</strong> <a href="http://tech.yahoo.com/news/ap/20091119/ap_on_hi_te/us_aol_layoffs">AOL to cut a third of staff </a> ....damn!</p>]]></description> <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 11:08:00 EST</pubDate> <category><![CDATA[Web Design]]></category>
  </item>
  
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[AT&amp;T Hits Back]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.forgetfoo.com/?blogid=10898]]></link>
	    <description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/18/atandt-hits-back-at-verizons-map-for-that-campaign-with-an-ad/" title="AT&amp;amp;T 'hits' back at Verizon's Map for That campaign with an 'ad' of its own" class="bold">AT&amp;amp;T 'hits' back at Verizon's Map for That campaign with an 'ad' of its own</a><div align="center" style="padding:25px 0;"><object width="640" height="505"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/X3PbBmElObI&amp;amp;hl=en_US&amp;amp;fs=1&amp;amp;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/X3PbBmElObI&amp;amp;hl=en_US&amp;amp;fs=1&amp;amp;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="640" height="505"></embed></object></div><p>have to admit, that's pretty awesome... *chuckle*</p>]]></description> <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 09:59:00 EST</pubDate> <category><![CDATA[Online/Web]]></category>
  </item>
  
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Bacon Pop!]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.forgetfoo.com/?blogid=10897]]></link>
	    <description><![CDATA[i don't care what they say, you simply can't have enough bacon in this world... and now they've gone and combined the two best smelling, tasty things in the world together -- bacon and popcorn, baby!<p align="center"><a href="http://www.uncrate.com/men/culture/food/bacon-pop/"><img src="http://www.forgetfoo.com/images/blog/baconpop.jpg" width="635" height="500" border="0" alt="Bacon Pop" class="pic" /></a></p><p>actually, i typically can't fucking <em>stand</em> the smell of popcorn... some of the guys nuke a bag of it everyday like clockwork, and the smell drives me knucking futz.</p><p>only time i don't seem to mind is when i step into a movie theater... go figure.</p><p><strong>p.s.</strong> <a href="http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/34023406/ns/today-today_health/">Movie popcorn = 3 burgers + 12 pats of butter</a></p><p>(hat tip: adam)</p>]]></description> <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 14:13:00 EST</pubDate> <category><![CDATA[Online/Web]]></category>
  </item>
  
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[IE9 Announced]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.forgetfoo.com/?blogid=10896]]></link>
	    <description><![CDATA[<a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2009/11/18/an-early-look-at-ie9-for-developers.aspx" title="An Early Look At IE9 for Developers" class="bold">An Early Look At IE9 for Developers</a><blockquote>We're just about a month after the Windows 7 launch, and wanted to show an early look at some of the work underway on Internet Explorer 9.<p><img src="http://www.forgetfoo.com/images/blog/Dean_PDC_2.jpg" width="578" height="251" border="0" alt="" /></p>At the PDC today, in addition to demonstrating some of the progress on performance and interoperable standards, we showed how IE and Windows will make the power of PC hardware available to web developers in the browser. Specifically, we demonstrated hardware-accelerated rendering of all graphics and text in web pages, something that other browsers don&amp;amp;rsquo;t do today. Web site developers will see performance gains and other benefits without having to re-write their sites.<br /><br /><strong>Performance Progress.</strong> Browser performance involves many different sub-systems within the browser. Different sites &amp;#8211; and different activities within the same site &amp;#8211; place different loads and demands on the browser.</blockquote><p>so it looks like IE9 has officially been announced &amp;#8211; moves rendering to the GPU for huge speed boost.</p><p>still sucks at everything else.</p>]]></description> <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 14:03:00 EST</pubDate> <category><![CDATA[Online/Web]]></category>
  </item>
  
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Xbox360 Broken = 60%]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.forgetfoo.com/?blogid=10895]]></link>
	    <description><![CDATA[<a href="http://crave.cnet.co.uk/gamesgear/0,39029441,49304288,00.htm" title="CNET UK's games console reliability survey: 60 per cent of Xbox 360s have broken" class="bold">CNET UK's games console reliability survey: 60 per cent of Xbox 360s have broken</a><blockquote><img src="http://www.forgetfoo.com/images/blog/broken_consoles.jpg" width="300" height="174" border="0" alt="Broken Consoles" align="right" class="pic" />Sixty per cent of Xbox 360s have kicked the red-ringed bucket, compared to 16 per cent of PS3s and just 6 per cent of Wiis, according to our survey on the reliability of games consoles in the UK.<br /><br />CNET UK commissioned the survey last month -- and the results don't reflect well on the Microsoft console. Some 1,128 UK-based console owners responded, of whom 562 owned Xbox 360s, 473 owned PS3s and 591 had Wiis (some owned more than one).<br /><br />Of those Xbox owners who have bought their Xbox since January 2008, 34 per cent report that their Xboxes have broken -- still double the lifetime failure rate of the PS3. Microsoft introduced new components in late 2007 and early 2008, when Bill Gates boasted of the Xbox's newfound "incredible reliability". Our survey shows that while the console has improved, it's still far from reaching Gates' goal of being the "most reliable video game box out there".<br /><br />Only 25 per cent of disappointed 360 owners had owned the console for more than 18 months before it broke, with 47 per cent reporting a failure inside a year. Seventy two per cent returned their Xbox to Microsoft, who extended the 360's warranty to three years after the console's problems became widely known. Fifteen per cent sought their own solution, such as repairing it themselves or giving up and throwing it under a bed. One miserable gamer reported, "I can't afford to get (the Xbox 360) fixed as it is out of warranty, so it sits in the spare room all lonely."<br /><br />Many 360 owners report the console breaking more than once. Of those whose console has broken at least once, 32 per cent say it has broken twice, and 19 per cent say it has broken three times or more. One person said their 360 "was repaired six times before (being) refunded by Microsoft".<br /><br />Of those who have bought a 360 in the last two years, only for it to break, 29 per cent say it has broken more than once.</blockquote><p>holy shit, batman!</p><p>i love my 360, and even though i've been on my second one for almost a year now, i have to say that the failure rate is beyond rediculous... 60%? seriously?! i'm not sure i even know anybody that <em>hasn't</em> had the dreaded "red ring of death" at least once.</p><p>whenever the next version of the Xbox comes out, i think i'll hold off for awhile and keep an eye on user reviews before buying one... i'll be damned if i'm going to be a guinea pig.</p>]]></description> <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 12:21:00 EST</pubDate> <category><![CDATA[Online/Web]]></category>
  </item>
  
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Brave New Web]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.forgetfoo.com/?blogid=10894]]></link>
	    <description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.webmonkey.com/blog/A_Brave_New_Web_Will_Be_Here_Soon__But_Browsers_Must_Improve" title="A Brave New Web Will Be Here Soon, But Browsers Must Improve" class="bold">A Brave New Web Will Be Here Soon, But Browsers Must Improve</a><blockquote><img src="http://www.forgetfoo.com/images/blog/html5-300.jpg" width="300" height="225" border="0" alt="HTML 5" align="right" class="pic"/>The great promise of HTML5 is that it will turn the web into a full-fledged computing platform awash with video, animation and real-time interactions, yet free of the hacks and plug-ins common today.<br /><br />While the language itself is almost fully baked, HTML5 won&amp;amp;rsquo;t fully arrive for at least another two years, according to one of the men charged with its design.<br />"I don't expect to see full implementation of HTML5 across all the major browsers until the end of 2011 at least," says Philippe Le Hegaret, interaction domain leader for the Worldwide Web Consortium (W3C), who oversees the development of HTML5.<br /><br />He tells Webmonkey the specification outlining the long-promised rewrite of the web's underlying language will be ready towards the end of 2010, but because of varying levels of support across different browsers, especially in the areas of video and animation, we're in for a longer wait.<br /><br />Most web pages are currently written in HTML version HTML 4.01, which has been around since the late 1990s. The web was mostly made up of static pages when HTML was born, and it has grown by leaps and bounds since then. Now, we favor complex web applications written in JavaScript like Gmail and Facebook, we stream videos in high-definition, we consume news in real-time feeds and generally push our browsers as far as they'll go. These developments have left HTML drastically outdated, and web authors have resorted to using a variety of hacks and plug-ins to make everything work properly.<br /><br />HTML5 &amp;#8212; which is actually a combination of languages, APIs and other technologies to make scripted applications more powerful &amp;#8212; promises to solve many of the problems of its predecessor, and do so without the hacks and plug-ins.<br /><br />We're already close. All the major browsers are providing some level of support for HTML5.</blockquote><p>i haven't really gotten too much into HTML5, since there's almost no practical support for it among browsers......... yet....... but i'm sure over the next year or two we'll get some big(er) updates from IE, Firefox, Chrome, and Safari and then we'll be able to start safely playing around with it... should be fun.</p>]]></description> <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 12:11:00 EST</pubDate> <category><![CDATA[Online/Web]]></category>
  </item>
  
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Joanna Krupa Eliminated]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.forgetfoo.com/?blogid=10893]]></link>
	    <description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.realitytvworld.com/news/joanna-krupa-and-derek-hough-eliminated-from-dancing-with-stars-9952.php" title="Joanna Krupa and Derek Hough eliminated from 'Dancing with the Stars'" class="bold">Joanna Krupa and Derek Hough eliminated from 'Dancing with the Stars'</a><p><img src="http://www.forgetfoo.com/images/blog/joanna_krupa4.jpg" width="640" height="424" border="0" alt="Joanna Krupa, the hottest damn polish woman in the world..!" class="pic" /></p><p>i readily admit to watching some <cite>Dancing with the Stars</cite> this season, mostly because i'm a fan of Joanna Krupa (hottest polish ass in the world)... and man, i'm kind of bummed out that she was eliminated lastnight... *sigh*</p><p>on the flipside, for the first time in ages i'm actually stoked and looking forward to an issue of Playboy, since she'll be <a href="http://www.silive.com/entertainment/tvfilm/index.ssf/2009/11/joanna_krupa_to_grace_cover_of.html" title="Joanna Krupa to grace cover of Playboy's December issue">gracing it's cover</a> in this december's issue. oh. yeah.</p>]]></description> <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 10:29:00 EST</pubDate> <category><![CDATA[Online/Web]]></category>
  </item>
  
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[MW2's Crazy Numbers]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.forgetfoo.com/?blogid=10892]]></link>
	    <description><![CDATA[<a href="http://kotaku.com/5407371/modern-warfare-2-by-the-xbox-live-numbers" title="Modern Warfare 2 By the Xbox Live Numbers" class="bold">Modern Warfare 2 By the Xbox Live Numbers</a><blockquote><img src="http://www.forgetfoo.com/images/blog/modern-warfare-2_01.jpg" width="240" height="160" border="0" alt="Modern Warfare 2" align="right" class="pic" />More than 2.2 million gamers logged more than 5.2 million multiplayer hours playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 on the first day alone, a new one-day Xbox Live record. Those gamers managed to unlock more than 11 million achievements in that day as well.<br /><br />Pretty crazy.<br /><br />If you missed Luke's excellent article comparing Modern Warfare 2 to other entertainment properties, you should go have a read. Today Activision says that their game pulled in an estimated $550 million in its first five days.<br /><br />That's compared to:<br />The largest reported five-day opening worldwide box office gross figures, held by Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince ($394 million)<br /><br />The largest reported five-day opening domestic box office gross figures, held by The Dark Knight ($203.8 million)<br /><br />The largest reported five-day worldwide video game sales record, previously held by Grand Theft Auto IV (6 million units, $500 million)<br /><br />The largest reported opening first-day domestic box office gross figures, held by The Dark Knight ($66.4 million)<br /><br />The largest reported first-day book sales in dollars, held by Harry Potter &amp;amp; The Deathly Hallows ($220 million)<br /><br />The largest reported first-day worldwide video game sales record, previously held by Grand Theft Auto IV (3.6 million units, $310 million)<br /><br />Pretty impressive.</blockquote><p>wow, that's pretty damn impressive indeed... a video game pulling in those kinds of numbers, in the first week alone? holy shit.</p>]]></description> <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 10:26:00 EST</pubDate> <category><![CDATA[Video Game]]></category>
  </item>
  
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Assassin's Creed II]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.forgetfoo.com/?blogid=10891]]></link>
	    <description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.wired.com/gamelife/2009/11/assassins-creed-ii-review/" title="Review: Assassin's Creed II Is the Ultimate Killer App" class="bold">Review: Assassin's Creed II Is the Ultimate Killer App</a><p><img src="http://www.forgetfoo.com/images/blog/ac2_s_039_florence_spearimpale-660x371.jpg" width="640" height="360" border="0" alt="Assassin's Creed II" class="pic" /></p><blockquote>You can't see me. I'm there in the shadows, crouched down on the roof above you, dangling on the ledge below you. Maybe you know I'm nearby. Maybe you're afraid for your life. You should be. Because by the time you realize where I am, you'll be dead.<br /><br />That's the promise of <cite>Assassin's Creed</cite>, a promise the original 2007 game failed to keep in nearly every way.<br /><br /><cite>Assassin's Creed II</cite>, released Tuesday for Xbox 360 and PlayStation 3 (reviewed), totally fulfills that promise. The sequel is as vibrant as the first game was repetitive, as compelling as the original was boring. The gameplay is rich and varied, blending assassinations with puzzles, acrobatics and stealth. It has a fantastic original story and setting &amp;#8212; a tale of family, conspiracy and betrayal in 15th-century Italy. <cite>Assassin's Creed II</cite> finally delivers everything the original promised and then some.</blockquote><p>it's out in stores today, and definitely one of the games i'm looking forward to playing at some point... actually, i believe it's already on jayden's christmas list.</p><p>for today, i'm looking forward to picking up the <strong>God of War: Colletion</strong> for the PS3 -- updated with 720p graphics and a demo for <strong>God of War III</strong>..? oh hell yeah, count me in.</p><p>also might stop and grab a copy of the new Star Trek movie on blu-ray.</p>]]></description> <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 16:52:00 EST</pubDate> <category><![CDATA[Video Game]]></category>
  </item>
  
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Late Afternoon APIs]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.forgetfoo.com/?blogid=10890]]></link>
	    <description><![CDATA[hey man, APIs can be sexy too, right? <a href="http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2009/11/apis-in-the-late-afternoon.html?utm_source=feedburner&amp;amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;amp;utm_campaign=Feed:+AVc+(A+VC)&amp;amp;utm_content=Google+Reader" title="APIs In The Late Afternoon" class="bold">APIs in the late afternoon...</a><blockquote><img src="http://www.forgetfoo.com/images/blog/api_chick_240.jpg" width="240" height="353" border="0" alt="API Chick" align="right" class="pic" />We talked about what is a real api, and I seconded our friend Joshua Schachter's assertion that a read-only api is not an api. I believe apis should allow full read/write access and the ideal api in my mind totally replicates the web app's functionality.<br /><br />That led us to Twitter naturally and I stated that the thing I want most from the Twitter api is sign up via the api. I realize that there are reasons why that hasn't happened yet, but I feel that Twitter has led the web world in providing full access to its application and sign up is a key feature that third party developers could do great things with.<br /><br />Quentin seized the opportunity to pounce on the monetization question and I stated my belief that the best way to monetize apis is to "send money with the api". I talked everyone through my Business Model Jujutsu post and ended with this line from Paul Forster, CEO of Indeed:<blockquote>We tried charging for our API without much success.  Then we paid developers to use it and it took off.</blockquote>We also talked about "api failures". I said that there are two kinds of api failures that I've noticed. The first is when the web app itself is not very popular and therefore developers aren't compelled to build to its api. That is not an issue with the api itself. The second is when the web app itself is very popular but the api is not so much. Usually the issue in this situation is the api is too restrictive and doesn't allow developers to do enough with it. I mentioned the Etsy api, which is read only, as an example of this situation. Fortunately, Chad Dickerson of Etsy, had preceded me at the event by a few hours and talked about how Etsy is taking their api to the next level by offering both read and write.</blockquote><p>i just thought it was an interesting read, being that you don't often see people writting or blogging about APIs.</p>]]></description> <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 16:45:00 EST</pubDate> <category><![CDATA[Online/Web]]></category>
  </item>
  
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[TWILF? Really?]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.forgetfoo.com/?blogid=10889]]></link>
	    <description><![CDATA[<a href="http://mashable.com/2009/11/16/twilf/" title="'Twilf' Enters the Twitter Vernacular [VIDEO]" class="bold">"Twilf" Enters the Twitter Vernacular [VIDEO]</a><blockquote>Current TV is coming under <a href="http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2009/11/15/al-gores-current-tv-bashes-limbaugh-beck-palin-fox-news">some fire</a> for using the term "Twilf" to describe former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin in an episode of the cartoon Super News called "The Stupid Virus."<div align="center" style="padding:20px 0;"><object id="ce_91442946" width="400" height="300" data="http://current.com/e/91442946/en_US"><param name="wmode" value="opaque"></param><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://current.com/e/91442946/en_US" width="400" height="300" wmode="opaque" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" ></embed></object></div>The episode features Palin writing tweets on her computer under the Twitterhandle "Gun-Ho," and Brian Williams of NBC reporting the story with the "Twilf" graphic (and also joking about how tweets are now news). Palin recently suggested <a href="http://www.facebook.com/sarahpalin?v=app_2309869772">on Facebook</a> that she plans to return to Twitter to coincide with the launch of her new book.</blockquote><p>please feel free to kill the person that came up with this...</p><p><strong>p.s.</strong> what the hell is a <a href="http://www.buzzfeed.com/expresident/soft-shoulder">"soft shoulder"</a>?</p>]]></description> <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 14:11:00 EST</pubDate> <category><![CDATA[Online/Web]]></category>
  </item>
  
</channel>
</rss>